read justice john paul stevenss dissenting opinion in the citizens united case. at bottom, the courts…

read justice john paul stevenss dissenting opinion in the citizens united case. at bottom, the courts opinion is... a rejection of the common sense of the american people, who have recognized a need to prevent corporations from undermining self - government since the founding, and who have fought against the distinctive corrupting potential of corporate electioneering since the days of theodore roosevelt. - justice stevens dissenting opinion citizens united v. federal elections commission what does justice stevens say about the courts ruling? corporate money will make elections more likely to reflect the public will. corporate money will have no influence on elections. corporate money has changed since the days of theodore roosevelt. corporate money will make elections less likely to reflect the public will.
Answer
Brief Explanations:
Justice Stevens believes the American people have long - recognized the need to prevent corporations from undermining self - government and the corrupting potential of corporate electioneering. He sees the Court's opinion as a rejection of this common sense, implying that corporate money will make elections less likely to reflect the public will.
Answer:
D. Corporate money will make elections less likely to reflect the public will.