read lolas argument that post - secondary degrees are beneficial.\nit seems like every high school student…

read lolas argument that post - secondary degrees are beneficial.\nit seems like every high school student is expected to further their education after high school. some teenagers resent the pressure this expectation puts on them. but we teens have to be realistic. a college degree or skilled trade certificate is necessary in todays world.\n75% of new jobs today require job applicants to have a college degree. many jobs require specific skills acquired through courses geared to that profession. of course, not every job requires the exact subject matter you learned at college. but employers are looking for people with perseverance, analytical skills, and the ability to communicate. those are the things you will learn during your years at college or in an apprenticeship.\nwhat is the best evaluation of the evidence lola provides?\nthe evidence is relevant but insufficient because it only discusses things one learns after high school.\nthe evidence sufficiently supports the reason about getting a job but does not relate to the claim.\nthe evidence relates to the claim but does not sufficiently address teenagers resentment of the pressure to continue schooling.\nthe evidence is relevant and sufficient because the main reason people continue their education is to gain skills to find a job and support themselves.

read lolas argument that post - secondary degrees are beneficial.\nit seems like every high school student is expected to further their education after high school. some teenagers resent the pressure this expectation puts on them. but we teens have to be realistic. a college degree or skilled trade certificate is necessary in todays world.\n75% of new jobs today require job applicants to have a college degree. many jobs require specific skills acquired through courses geared to that profession. of course, not every job requires the exact subject matter you learned at college. but employers are looking for people with perseverance, analytical skills, and the ability to communicate. those are the things you will learn during your years at college or in an apprenticeship.\nwhat is the best evaluation of the evidence lola provides?\nthe evidence is relevant but insufficient because it only discusses things one learns after high school.\nthe evidence sufficiently supports the reason about getting a job but does not relate to the claim.\nthe evidence relates to the claim but does not sufficiently address teenagers resentment of the pressure to continue schooling.\nthe evidence is relevant and sufficient because the main reason people continue their education is to gain skills to find a job and support themselves.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Lola's claim is that post - secondary degrees are beneficial. Her evidence about job requirements (75% needing a degree) and skills learned relates to the claim. But it doesn't address teenagers' resentment of schooling pressure.

Answer:

The evidence relates to the claim but does not sufficiently address teenagers’ resentment of the pressure to continue schooling.