read the passage from the opinion of the court in dred scott v. sandford, written by justice taney. the…

read the passage from the opinion of the court in dred scott v. sandford, written by justice taney. the question then arises, whether the provisions of the constitution, in relation to the personal rights and privileges to which the citizen of a state should be entitled, embraced the negro african race, at that time in this country, or who might afterwards be imported, who had then or should afterwards be made free in any state; and to put it in the power of a single state to make him a citizen of the united states, and endue him with the full rights of citizenship in every other state without their consent? does the constitution of the united states act upon him whenever he shall be made free under the laws of a state, and raised there to the rank of a citizen, and immediately clothe him with all the privileges of a citizen in every other state, and in its own courts? why is justice taneys argument ineffective? he uses the freedom of black people as evidence. he uses a previous status of black people as evidence. he uses the dissenting argument of the court as evidence. he uses the ruling of the previous court as evidence.

read the passage from the opinion of the court in dred scott v. sandford, written by justice taney. the question then arises, whether the provisions of the constitution, in relation to the personal rights and privileges to which the citizen of a state should be entitled, embraced the negro african race, at that time in this country, or who might afterwards be imported, who had then or should afterwards be made free in any state; and to put it in the power of a single state to make him a citizen of the united states, and endue him with the full rights of citizenship in every other state without their consent? does the constitution of the united states act upon him whenever he shall be made free under the laws of a state, and raised there to the rank of a citizen, and immediately clothe him with all the privileges of a citizen in every other state, and in its own courts? why is justice taneys argument ineffective? he uses the freedom of black people as evidence. he uses a previous status of black people as evidence. he uses the dissenting argument of the court as evidence. he uses the ruling of the previous court as evidence.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Justice Taney used the previous status of Black people (enslaved and with limited rights historically) as evidence to argue they were not intended to be citizens under the Constitution. This is a weak - argument as it relies on a discriminatory past status rather than a more just and inclusive interpretation of the Constitution's principles.

Answer:

He uses a previous status of Black people as evidence.