read the passage from the opinion of the court in dred scott v. sandford, written by justice taney. the…

read the passage from the opinion of the court in dred scott v. sandford, written by justice taney. the question before us is, whether the class of persons described in the plea in abatement compose a portion of this people, and are constituent members of this sovereignty? we think they are not, and that they are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word citizens in the constitution, and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the united states. what type of fallacy does this argument represent? hasty generalization ad populum begging the claim genetic fallacy

read the passage from the opinion of the court in dred scott v. sandford, written by justice taney. the question before us is, whether the class of persons described in the plea in abatement compose a portion of this people, and are constituent members of this sovereignty? we think they are not, and that they are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word citizens in the constitution, and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the united states. what type of fallacy does this argument represent? hasty generalization ad populum begging the claim genetic fallacy

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The court assumes what it is trying to prove, that the class of persons is not part of the people or citizens without proper justification. This is begging the claim, also known as circular - reasoning, where the conclusion is assumed in the premise.

Answer:

begging the claim