read the scenario. joe, a reporter for main street news, covered a campaign rally for jiya patel, who is…

read the scenario. joe, a reporter for main street news, covered a campaign rally for jiya patel, who is running for county commissioner. while at the rally, he interviewed the candidate and some audience members as his research for the article. he then wrote an article describing the rally, the candidate’s platform, and the reasons her supporters believe that she is the best person for this job. when he finished, he turned his article in to his editor. as the editor reviews this story, he sees a public report on campaign donations and learns that joe has made a sizeable contribution to patel’s campaign. what is the most ethical action for the editor to take? edit the article that was written to make sure it is objective, then run it in tomorrow’s edition of the newspaper explain to the reporter that the newspaper cannot run the story because of perceived bias based on donations, so the article is being reassigned discuss the article with the reporter to better understand his affiliation with the candidate and his views on the upcoming local elections ask a reporter who supports an opposing candidate to read and help edit the article to ensure there is no bias in the reporting
Answer
Brief Explanations:
The reporter's donation to the candidate creates a perception of bias. Reassigning the article is the most ethical as it avoids potential bias in reporting. Editing the article by the current editor may not fully remove the bias perception, discussing with the reporter may not resolve the bias issue, and having a reporter from an opposing - side edit may also introduce other problems.
Answer:
explain to the reporter that the newspaper cannot run the story because of perceived bias based on donations, so the article is being reassigned