read the scenario and review the social media post.\nana comes across this post by a biologist…

read the scenario and review the social media post.\nana comes across this post by a biologist named\nprofessor strange. she knows that biologists are\nscientists and that scientists sometimes discover new\nplants and animals.\nprofessor strange\n@reallyweirdscience\napril 10, 2021\nbiologists in germany have found a new lichen\non forest trees. they have named it ocular\nlichen, after its eye-like structures.\nhow can ana fact-check the post?\n○ she can perform a separate search on the claim.\n● she can accept the likes and shares as evidence.\n○ she can look for other posts by professor strange.\n○ she can research how lichens attach to forest trees.

read the scenario and review the social media post.\nana comes across this post by a biologist named\nprofessor strange. she knows that biologists are\nscientists and that scientists sometimes discover new\nplants and animals.\nprofessor strange\n@reallyweirdscience\napril 10, 2021\nbiologists in germany have found a new lichen\non forest trees. they have named it ocular\nlichen, after its eye-like structures.\nhow can ana fact-check the post?\n○ she can perform a separate search on the claim.\n● she can accept the likes and shares as evidence.\n○ she can look for other posts by professor strange.\n○ she can research how lichens attach to forest trees.

Answer

Answer:

A. She can perform a separate search on the claim.

Brief Explanations:

Likes/shares do not count as factual evidence, other posts by the same user don't verify this specific claim, and researching lichen attachment doesn't confirm the existence of this new named lichen. A separate search for the claim about the new "ocular lichen" found by German biologists is the only valid fact-checking method to verify if the discovery is real and documented.