read the sentence. the lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury it was unbelievable how influenced they…
read the sentence. the lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case in the hopes of winning the trial. which is the best revision of the sentence? the lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury (it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case) in hope of winning the trial. the lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury—it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case—in hope of winning the trial. the lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury, it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case, in hope of winning the trial. no change
Answer
Brief Explanations:
The original sentence has a clear subject - verb - object structure and is grammatically correct. The option that best revises it should maintain this clarity without introducing errors. The original sentence "The lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury; it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case in hope of winning the trial" has a correct semicolon usage to separate two related independent clauses. The other options either have incorrect punctuation or change the meaning.
Answer:
The original sentence (The lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury; it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case in hope of winning the trial) with no change is the best revision. So the answer is: no change.