read the text.\nfor years, ive joined with local soccer players in calling for a soccer dome to be built in…

read the text.\nfor years, ive joined with local soccer players in calling for a soccer dome to be built in our city. to me, its a no - brainer; we live in a state where winter can last six months. as one athlete stated at the recent city council meeting, our teams deserve safe, high - quality fields to play on, all year round.\nhowever, now that the council has voted to go ahead with the project, i find myself at odds with my former soccer - playing allies. they want the dome to be built behind the recreation center, replacing the outdoor fields where community teams currently play. that plan is a bad idea; with the sports growing popularity, our city should be increasing the number of soccer fields available to players. besides that, when weather permits, its healthier (and less expensive) for athletes to play on outdoor fields. i believe we should retain the outdoor fields and find an alternate location for the dome.\nwhich sentence best summarizes the authors point of view about the soccer dome?\nthe dome would be a great asset to the community if it is built in a separate location from the outdoor soccer fields.\nthe proposed dome project should be scrapped because it is healthier and cheaper to play on outdoor soccer fields.
Answer
Brief Explanations:
The author initially supported a soccer - dome. But now opposes building it where outdoor fields are as they think the city should increase field numbers and outdoor play is better when possible. They suggest building the dome elsewhere.
Answer:
The dome would be a great asset to the community if it is built in a separate location from the outdoor soccer fields.