read your genetic data isnt safe. watch hacking your dna: the big business - and risk - of home tests. after…

read your genetic data isnt safe. watch hacking your dna: the big business - and risk - of home tests. after reading through the article and watching the video, discuss whether or not you think its ethical for genetic data companies (i.e., ancestry, 23andme) to sell your data to pharmaceutical companies? before you make your decision, be sure to watch a genome hackers experience with the privacy of shared data. be sure to include evidence (quotes, specific information, data, etc) from the article: your genetic data isnt safe and/or video to support your response.
Answer
Brief Explanations:
This is an ethical - related question. Arguments for the practice could include potential medical advancements as the data may help in drug development. For example, if genetic data can be used to identify genetic markers for diseases, it could lead to more targeted and effective treatments. Arguments against could focus on privacy concerns. As stated in the materials, genetic data is highly personal and sensitive. Selling it without clear and full - informed consent may violate individuals' privacy rights. Evidence from the article or video could be used to support either side. For instance, if the video shows cases of data misuse, it strengthens the argument against.
Answer:
There are two main perspectives. One could argue it is ethical if it leads to significant medical benefits and proper consent procedures are in place. On the other hand, it could be considered unethical due to privacy violations if consent is not fully informed or if there is a risk of data misuse. Evidence from the provided resources should be used to support the chosen stance.