review the claim and the two pieces of evidence. contrary to what many people think, granola is not actually…

review the claim and the two pieces of evidence. contrary to what many people think, granola is not actually a health food. evidence a: in an email to the coach of a local soccer team, a parent who is an economist shared that granola was not the best choice for a wholesome post - game snack. he stated that granola seems too sweet to be a healthy snack. evidence b: a major newspaper reports that the governments dietary guidelines classify granola as a \grain - based dessert.\ the article also notes that many granolas are comparable to cake and ice cream in sugar content. why is evidence b stronger than evidence a? evidence a does not directly support the claim. it does not mention whether granola is a healthy food. evidence a does not come from a credible source. it is based on the opinion of one person who is not an expert on food or diet.
Answer
Brief Explanations:
Evidence A is from a non - food expert's opinion in an email. Evidence B comes from a major newspaper reporting government dietary guidelines, which are more authoritative and directly relate to granola's health - food status by comparing sugar content to desserts.
Answer:
Evidence B is stronger because it comes from a more credible source (major newspaper reporting government guidelines) and directly relates to granola's classification and sugar content in comparison to desserts, while Evidence A is just the opinion of a non - food expert.