3.2 review question: free response\nin texas v. johnson (1989), the supreme court overturned a texas state…

3.2 review question: free response\nin texas v. johnson (1989), the supreme court overturned a texas state law banning flag burning as a violation of the first amendment’s protection of free speech. according to an article by the washington post,\npolls show that most americans want flag desecration outlawed... they said that burning a u.s. flag in public—while rare these days—is a reprehensible insult to the nation’s founders and a dishonor to the americans who died fighting tyranny.\n—charles babington, “senate rejects flag desecration amendment,” washington post, june 28, 2006\nafter reading the scenario, respond to parts a, b, and c.\na. describe an action congress could take to address the concerns of citizens polled in the scenario.\nb. in the context of the scenario, explain how ideological divisions could prevent the action described in part a.

3.2 review question: free response\nin texas v. johnson (1989), the supreme court overturned a texas state law banning flag burning as a violation of the first amendment’s protection of free speech. according to an article by the washington post,\npolls show that most americans want flag desecration outlawed... they said that burning a u.s. flag in public—while rare these days—is a reprehensible insult to the nation’s founders and a dishonor to the americans who died fighting tyranny.\n—charles babington, “senate rejects flag desecration amendment,” washington post, june 28, 2006\nafter reading the scenario, respond to parts a, b, and c.\na. describe an action congress could take to address the concerns of citizens polled in the scenario.\nb. in the context of the scenario, explain how ideological divisions could prevent the action described in part a.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

A. Congress could propose a constitutional amendment to ban flag desecration. This would override the Supreme - Court's decision based on the First Amendment as it would change the Constitution itself. B. Ideological divisions could prevent this as those who strongly support free - speech rights (even in the form of flag - burning as a form of expression) would oppose the amendment. Liberals and libertarians, for example, may view flag - burning as a form of political speech protected by the First Amendment, while conservatives may see it as an act of disrespect that should be criminalized. These opposing views can lead to gridlock in Congress and prevent the passage of such an amendment.

Answer:

A. Propose a constitutional amendment to ban flag desecration. B. Those who support free - speech rights may oppose the amendment, creating gridlock in Congress.