review question 7\nin a study by mika r. moran, daniel a. rodriguez, and colleagues, residents of la paz…

review question 7\nin a study by mika r. moran, daniel a. rodriguez, and colleagues, residents of la paz, bolivia, and fortaleza, brazil, were surveyed about parks in their cities. of the 528 respondents from la paz, 67.5% indicated that they use the citys parks, and of the 938 respondents from fortaleza, 35.7% indicated using city parks. given that the percentage of la paz respondents who reported living within a 10 - minute walk of a park was much lower than that reported by fortaleza respondents, greater proximity alone cant explain the difference in park use.\nthe text makes which point about the difference between the proportions of la paz residents and fortaleza residents using parks?\na it was much larger than the researchers conducting the study expected.\nb it was calculated using sources that predate the survey.\nc it could be due to inaccuracies in the survey results.\nd it is caused by something other than the parks proximity to city residents.

review question 7\nin a study by mika r. moran, daniel a. rodriguez, and colleagues, residents of la paz, bolivia, and fortaleza, brazil, were surveyed about parks in their cities. of the 528 respondents from la paz, 67.5% indicated that they use the citys parks, and of the 938 respondents from fortaleza, 35.7% indicated using city parks. given that the percentage of la paz respondents who reported living within a 10 - minute walk of a park was much lower than that reported by fortaleza respondents, greater proximity alone cant explain the difference in park use.\nthe text makes which point about the difference between the proportions of la paz residents and fortaleza residents using parks?\na it was much larger than the researchers conducting the study expected.\nb it was calculated using sources that predate the survey.\nc it could be due to inaccuracies in the survey results.\nd it is caused by something other than the parks proximity to city residents.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The text states that since the percentage of La Paz residents living within a 10 - minute walk of a park was lower than Fortaleza respondents but La Paz had a higher park - use rate, proximity alone can't explain the difference. So, it implies that something other than proximity causes the difference.

Answer:

D. It is caused by something other than the parks’ proximity to city residents.