under roman law, someone accusing another person of a crime needed\n○ belief that the accused was guilty.\n○…

under roman law, someone accusing another person of a crime needed\n○ belief that the accused was guilty.\n○ proof that a crime had been committed.\n○ a lawyer willing to take the case to trial.\n○ a witness to vouch for the accusers character.

under roman law, someone accusing another person of a crime needed\n○ belief that the accused was guilty.\n○ proof that a crime had been committed.\n○ a lawyer willing to take the case to trial.\n○ a witness to vouch for the accusers character.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Under Roman - law, for an accusation of a crime, proof of the commission of the crime was required. Mere belief was not sufficient. The presence of a lawyer willing to take the case to trial or a witness vouching for the accuser's character was not a fundamental requirement for making an accusation.

Answer:

proof that a crime had been committed.