under roman law, someone accusing another person of a crime needed belief that the accused was guilty. proof…

under roman law, someone accusing another person of a crime needed belief that the accused was guilty. proof that a crime had been committed. a lawyer willing to take the case to trial. a witness to vouch for the accusers character.

under roman law, someone accusing another person of a crime needed belief that the accused was guilty. proof that a crime had been committed. a lawyer willing to take the case to trial. a witness to vouch for the accusers character.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Under Roman - law, for an accusation of a crime, proof of the crime's commission was required. Mere belief was not sufficient, and the presence of a lawyer willing to take the case or a witness vouching for the accuser's character was not a fundamental requirement for making an accusation.

Answer:

proof that a crime had been committed.