under roman law, someone accusing another person of a crime needed\nbelief that the accused was…
under roman law, someone accusing another person of a crime needed\nbelief that the accused was guilty.\nproof that a crime had been committed.\na lawyer willing to take the case to trial.\na witness to vouch for the accusers character.
Answer
Brief Explanations:
Under Roman - law, for an accusation of a crime, proof of the commission of the crime was required. Mere belief of guilt was not sufficient. The presence of a lawyer willing to take the case to trial or a witness vouching for the accuser's character was not a fundamental requirement for making an accusation.
Answer:
proof that a crime had been committed.