which scenarios are considered ethically acceptable for journalists? select three options.\n□ paying money…

which scenarios are considered ethically acceptable for journalists? select three options.\n□ paying money to attend a conference about climate change in order to do research for an article\n□ accepting money from a politician to report on an opponent, then donating the money to a charity\n□ ending an investigation because it may lead to violence and disunity in a local community\n□ interviewing the ceos of two insurance companies that are competing against each other\n□ using information from a wiki page to clarify information about a topic

which scenarios are considered ethically acceptable for journalists? select three options.\n□ paying money to attend a conference about climate change in order to do research for an article\n□ accepting money from a politician to report on an opponent, then donating the money to a charity\n□ ending an investigation because it may lead to violence and disunity in a local community\n□ interviewing the ceos of two insurance companies that are competing against each other\n□ using information from a wiki page to clarify information about a topic

Answer

Brief Explanations:

  • Paying to attend a conference for research is ethical as it's for gathering info.
  • Ending an investigation to prevent harm (violence, disunity) is ethical (prioritizing community well - being).
  • Interviewing competing CEOs is ethical for balanced reporting.
  • Accepting money from a politician (even if donated later) creates bias, unethical. Using a wiki (unreliable source) for clarification is unethical as it's not a credible info source.

Answer:

  • paying money to attend a conference about climate change in order to do research for an article
  • ending an investigation because it may lead to violence and disunity in a local community
  • interviewing the CEOs of two insurance companies that are competing against each other