the selection of federal justices by the executive branch is an example of\no checks and balances.\no…

the selection of federal justices by the executive branch is an example of\no checks and balances.\no original jurisdiction.\no advice and consent.\no appellate jurisdiction.

the selection of federal justices by the executive branch is an example of\no checks and balances.\no original jurisdiction.\no advice and consent.\no appellate jurisdiction.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Checks and balances is a system where different branches of government limit each other's power. The executive branch selecting federal justices is a way to balance the judicial branch, ensuring no single branch becomes too powerful. Original jurisdiction refers to a court's power to hear a case first. Advice and consent is mainly about the Senate's role in approving presidential - appointed officials. Appellate jurisdiction is about a court's power to review lower - court decisions.

Answer:

A. checks and balances