if serbia had used the term \murder\ rather than \ethnic cleansing\ to describe its actions against muslims…

if serbia had used the term \murder\ rather than \ethnic cleansing\ to describe its actions against muslims, it is likely that they would have\n\no proceeded in exactly the same way.\no won more civilian support for their actions.\no felt too guilty to continue with their plans.\no achieved their goals more quickly.

if serbia had used the term \murder\ rather than \ethnic cleansing\ to describe its actions against muslims, it is likely that they would have\n\no proceeded in exactly the same way.\no won more civilian support for their actions.\no felt too guilty to continue with their plans.\no achieved their goals more quickly.

Answer

Answer:

C. felt too guilty to continue with their plans.

Brief Explanations:

The term "murder" has a more direct - and morally condemnable - connotation than "ethnic cleansing." Using "murder" would likely make those involved feel more guilt, potentially halting their plans. The other options are less likely as the negative moral weight of "murder" would not lead to the same actions, more civilian support, or quicker goal - achievement.