a social science student conducted a survey, and the results indicated that sugar intake increases the…

a social science student conducted a survey, and the results indicated that sugar intake increases the activity level of 4 - year - old children. the student used this conclusion in his recent paper. what could be wrong with this conclusion? the survey is not a reliable data collection method. the study relied only one type of data collection method. the study did not take into account other factors, such as nap time. the study relied on the observation of the student.

a social science student conducted a survey, and the results indicated that sugar intake increases the activity level of 4 - year - old children. the student used this conclusion in his recent paper. what could be wrong with this conclusion? the survey is not a reliable data collection method. the study relied only one type of data collection method. the study did not take into account other factors, such as nap time. the study relied on the observation of the student.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

In social science research, when drawing conclusions, it's important to consider confounding variables. Just because sugar intake and activity level are correlated (as shown in the survey), it doesn't mean sugar intake causes the increase in activity. There could be other factors (like nap time, diet in general, physical activity opportunities throughout the day etc.) that influence the activity level of 4 - year - olds. A survey alone (even if it's a reliable data - collection method) that only looks at sugar intake and activity level without controlling for or at least considering other variables is flawed.

Answer:

The study did not take into account other factors, such as nap time.