source: paul ratner, \a native american chief should have replaced andrew jackson on the $20.\ published in…

source: paul ratner, \a native american chief should have replaced andrew jackson on the $20.\ published in the big think, 2016: andrew jackson deserved to be booted from our money. the seventh president owned hundred of slaves, was a ruthless soldier and was instrumental in the forceful relocation of native americans from their ancestral lands. student text: in ratners opinion, \andrew jackson deserved to be booted from our money\ because of his horrible treatment of native americans. is the student text plagiarized? no, it is not plagiarized. yes, because it fails to cite the source. yes, because it fails to use quotation marks and fails to cite the source.

source: paul ratner, \a native american chief should have replaced andrew jackson on the $20.\ published in the big think, 2016: andrew jackson deserved to be booted from our money. the seventh president owned hundred of slaves, was a ruthless soldier and was instrumental in the forceful relocation of native americans from their ancestral lands. student text: in ratners opinion, \andrew jackson deserved to be booted from our money\ because of his horrible treatment of native americans. is the student text plagiarized? no, it is not plagiarized. yes, because it fails to cite the source. yes, because it fails to use quotation marks and fails to cite the source.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The student text uses the exact phrase "Andrew Jackson deserved to be booted from our money" from the source without using quotation marks. Also, while it mentions Ratner's opinion, proper citation (like in - text citation with page number if available, etc., depending on citation style) is not done as per academic standards.

Answer:

Yes, because it fails to use quotation marks and fails to cite the source.