which statement best evaluates the effectiveness of the evidence in the text?\nthe argument is convincing…

which statement best evaluates the effectiveness of the evidence in the text?\nthe argument is convincing because the authors use varied forms of relevant evidence, including well - researched studies and verifiable data.\nthe argument is convincing because the authors use varied forms of relevant evidence, including eyewitness accounts and personal anecdotes.\nthe argument is not convincing because the authors support their points only with their own opinions, which is not sufficient evidence to support the claim.\nthe argument is not convincing because the authors focus only on facts and data related to bit.ly links and twitter usage, which is not sufficient evidence to support the claim.

which statement best evaluates the effectiveness of the evidence in the text?\nthe argument is convincing because the authors use varied forms of relevant evidence, including well - researched studies and verifiable data.\nthe argument is convincing because the authors use varied forms of relevant evidence, including eyewitness accounts and personal anecdotes.\nthe argument is not convincing because the authors support their points only with their own opinions, which is not sufficient evidence to support the claim.\nthe argument is not convincing because the authors focus only on facts and data related to bit.ly links and twitter usage, which is not sufficient evidence to support the claim.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Well - researched studies and verifiable data are strong forms of evidence that can make an argument convincing. Eyewitness accounts and personal anecdotes can be subjective. Relying only on one's own opinions is weak evidence. Focusing only on a narrow set of facts like bit.ly links and Twitter usage may not be comprehensive enough.

Answer:

The argument is convincing because the authors use varied forms of relevant evidence, including well - researched studies and verifiable data.