which statement best summarizes part of the ruling in gibbons v. ogden?\nregulating interstate commerce is…

which statement best summarizes part of the ruling in gibbons v. ogden?\nregulating interstate commerce is an abuse of power.\na state can make laws that regulate commerce in neighboring states.\nstate licenses make federal licenses unnecessary.\na state can regulate commerce that takes place within its own borders.

which statement best summarizes part of the ruling in gibbons v. ogden?\nregulating interstate commerce is an abuse of power.\na state can make laws that regulate commerce in neighboring states.\nstate licenses make federal licenses unnecessary.\na state can regulate commerce that takes place within its own borders.

Answer

Answer:

D. A state can regulate commerce that takes place within its own borders.

Brief Explanations:

En el caso Gibbons v. Ogden, la Corte Suprema de EE. UU. estableció que el Congreso tiene el poder exclusivo de regular el comercio interestatal, pero los estados pueden regular el comercio interno. Esta opción refleja correctamente esa interpretación.