which statement represents the key difference between the courts view of equal - access in plessy and its…

which statement represents the key difference between the courts view of equal - access in plessy and its view in regents? the court shifted from arguing that african americans were entitled to legal protection to arguing that they were not. the court shifted from opposing legal segregation to supporting it. the court shifted from actively discouraging racial segregation to actively encouraging it. the court shifted from saying that segregation was legal to saying that any laws made based on race would be subject to

which statement represents the key difference between the courts view of equal - access in plessy and its view in regents? the court shifted from arguing that african americans were entitled to legal protection to arguing that they were not. the court shifted from opposing legal segregation to supporting it. the court shifted from actively discouraging racial segregation to actively encouraging it. the court shifted from saying that segregation was legal to saying that any laws made based on race would be subject to

Answer

Brief Explanations:

In Plessy v. Ferguson, the Court upheld legal - segregation under the "separate but equal" doctrine. In Regents of the University of California v. Bakke and other later - cases, the Court began to subject race - based laws to more scrutiny. The key shift is from deeming segregation legal to subjecting race - based laws to more strict review.

Answer:

The Court shifted from saying that segregation was legal to saying that any laws made based on race would be subject to scrutiny.