suggestions for improving a university\ngabrielle adams and colleagues reviewed suggestions for improving a…

suggestions for improving a university\ngabrielle adams and colleagues reviewed suggestions for improving a university that had been submitted to the universitys president. they coded each suggestion as additive (the idea suggested adding something new to the university), subtractive (the idea suggested removing something from the university), neither additive nor subtractive, or invalid (the idea was not comprehensible). the data illustrated peoples tendency to overlook the possibility of removing things to achieve improvements:\nwhich choice most effectively uses data in the graph to complete the statement?\nchoose 1 answer:\na fewer than 100 suggestions were coded as subtractive, whereas more than 550 suggestions were coded as additive.\nb more than 350 suggestions were coded as invalid, whereas fewer than 100 suggestions were coded as subtractive.\nc around 575 suggestions were coded as additive, whereas around 175 suggestions were coded as subtractive.\nd around 175 suggestions were coded as neither additive nor subtractive, whereas around 575 suggestions were coded as additive.

suggestions for improving a university\ngabrielle adams and colleagues reviewed suggestions for improving a university that had been submitted to the universitys president. they coded each suggestion as additive (the idea suggested adding something new to the university), subtractive (the idea suggested removing something from the university), neither additive nor subtractive, or invalid (the idea was not comprehensible). the data illustrated peoples tendency to overlook the possibility of removing things to achieve improvements:\nwhich choice most effectively uses data in the graph to complete the statement?\nchoose 1 answer:\na fewer than 100 suggestions were coded as subtractive, whereas more than 550 suggestions were coded as additive.\nb more than 350 suggestions were coded as invalid, whereas fewer than 100 suggestions were coded as subtractive.\nc around 575 suggestions were coded as additive, whereas around 175 suggestions were coded as subtractive.\nd around 175 suggestions were coded as neither additive nor subtractive, whereas around 575 suggestions were coded as additive.

Answer

Explanation:

Step1: Analyze bar - heights

From the bar - chart, the height of the "additive" bar is well above 500, close to 600. The height of the "subtractive" bar is less than 100. The "neither additive nor subtractive" bar is around 200 and the "invalid" bar is around 50.

Step2: Evaluate each option

  • Option A: The "additive" bar is indeed more than 550 (close to 600) and the "subtractive" bar is fewer than 100. This option correctly uses the data from the graph.
  • Option B: The "invalid" bar is around 50, not more than 350, so this option is incorrect.
  • Option C: The "subtractive" bar is fewer than 100, not around 175, so this option is incorrect.
  • Option D: The "neither additive nor subtractive" bar is around 200, not around 175, so this option is incorrect.

Answer:

A. fewer than 100 suggestions were coded as subtractive, whereas more than 550 suggestions were coded as additive.