how did the supreme court rule on affirmative action in the case of regents v. bakke?\nrace should be…

how did the supreme court rule on affirmative action in the case of regents v. bakke?\nrace should be considered, but racial quotas are discriminatory.\nracial quotas were not used to make admissions decisions.\nthe student was not a good candidate to be a doctor.\nuniversities should not consider race as a factor for admission.

how did the supreme court rule on affirmative action in the case of regents v. bakke?\nrace should be considered, but racial quotas are discriminatory.\nracial quotas were not used to make admissions decisions.\nthe student was not a good candidate to be a doctor.\nuniversities should not consider race as a factor for admission.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

In the Regents v. Bakke case, the Supreme Court held that race could be a factor in college admissions (to promote diversity), but racial quotas (like setting aside a specific number of seats for a racial group) were discriminatory.

Answer:

Race should be considered, but racial quotas are discriminatory.