the supreme courts decision\nthe supreme court overturned the court of appeals decision and restored…

the supreme courts decision\nthe supreme court overturned the court of appeals decision and restored alvarados conviction. the court said that being \in custody\ was a matter of law, not of whether alvarado believed he was in custody. even though alvarado was a minor, he was not in custody by law, so he did not have to be reminded of his miranda rights.\nwhich answer best describes the courts decision?\nthe confession cannot be used, because alvarado believed that he could not leave.\nthe confession can be used, because alvarado was not in custody.\nthe confession can be used, because alvarado thought that he could leave.\nthe confession cannot be used, because alvarado did not know his rights

the supreme courts decision\nthe supreme court overturned the court of appeals decision and restored alvarados conviction. the court said that being \in custody\ was a matter of law, not of whether alvarado believed he was in custody. even though alvarado was a minor, he was not in custody by law, so he did not have to be reminded of his miranda rights.\nwhich answer best describes the courts decision?\nthe confession cannot be used, because alvarado believed that he could not leave.\nthe confession can be used, because alvarado was not in custody.\nthe confession can be used, because alvarado thought that he could leave.\nthe confession cannot be used, because alvarado did not know his rights

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The Supreme - Court said Alvarado was not in custody by law, so his confession can be used as he didn't need a Miranda rights reminder.

Answer:

The confession can be used, because Alvarado was not in custody.