text 1\nmichigan state university and the investment bank jpmorgan chase\nare two of the many institutions…

text 1\nmichigan state university and the investment bank jpmorgan chase\nare two of the many institutions offering training programs in\nentrepreneurship. but what results do such programs produce? in a\nstudy of college students in poland, researcher paul jones and\ncolleagues addressed this question and reported that participants who\nreceived entrepreneurial training showed strong intentions to become\nentrepreneurs.\ntext 2\nwhile studies of entrepreneurial training typically report positive\nresults, a close look at these studies reveals widespread\nmethodological shortcomings. this research literature is plagued by\nunclear hypotheses, insufficient sample sizes, a lack of control groups,\nand failures to establish pretraining baselines for the measured\nattributes of participants.\nbased on the texts, the author of text 2 would most like to know the\nanswer to which question about jones and colleagues study that is\nnot addressed in text 1?\na) did the participants that jones and colleagues included in the study\nshare any characteristics or life circumstances?\nb) did jones and colleagues compare polish college students who\nreceived the training with a group of successful entrepreneurs who did\nnot receive the training?\nc) did jones and colleagues measure any attributes of the\nparticipants in the study after they had received the training?\nd) how many polish college students did jones and colleagues\ninclude in the study?

text 1\nmichigan state university and the investment bank jpmorgan chase\nare two of the many institutions offering training programs in\nentrepreneurship. but what results do such programs produce? in a\nstudy of college students in poland, researcher paul jones and\ncolleagues addressed this question and reported that participants who\nreceived entrepreneurial training showed strong intentions to become\nentrepreneurs.\ntext 2\nwhile studies of entrepreneurial training typically report positive\nresults, a close look at these studies reveals widespread\nmethodological shortcomings. this research literature is plagued by\nunclear hypotheses, insufficient sample sizes, a lack of control groups,\nand failures to establish pretraining baselines for the measured\nattributes of participants.\nbased on the texts, the author of text 2 would most like to know the\nanswer to which question about jones and colleagues study that is\nnot addressed in text 1?\na) did the participants that jones and colleagues included in the study\nshare any characteristics or life circumstances?\nb) did jones and colleagues compare polish college students who\nreceived the training with a group of successful entrepreneurs who did\nnot receive the training?\nc) did jones and colleagues measure any attributes of the\nparticipants in the study after they had received the training?\nd) how many polish college students did jones and colleagues\ninclude in the study?

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Text 2 points out methodological shortcomings in entrepreneurship training studies, such as insufficient sample sizes. Text 1 doesn't mention the number of participants. So, the author of Text 2 would likely want to know the sample size (how many students were included).

Answer:

D. How many Polish college students did Jones and colleagues include in the study?