though the outcomes of tinker and schenck differed, which best describes what these court decisions have in…

though the outcomes of tinker and schenck differed, which best describes what these court decisions have in common?\nthey agreed that political expression could be restricted.\nthey agreed that libel was not protected speech.\nthey agreed that symbolic speech could be protected.\nthey agreed that speech rights could be limited to protect safety.

though the outcomes of tinker and schenck differed, which best describes what these court decisions have in common?\nthey agreed that political expression could be restricted.\nthey agreed that libel was not protected speech.\nthey agreed that symbolic speech could be protected.\nthey agreed that speech rights could be limited to protect safety.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

In both Tinker v. Des Moines (students' symbolic speech - wearing black armbands - was protected) and Schenck v. United States (speech that presents a "clear and present danger" can be restricted), the idea that speech rights can be limited for safety - in Schenck for national - security during war and in Tinker to maintain order in schools - is present.

Answer:

They agreed that speech rights could be limited to protect safety.