though the outcomes of tinker and schenck differed, which best describes what these court decisions have in…

though the outcomes of tinker and schenck differed, which best describes what these court decisions have in common? they agreed that political expression could be restricted. they agreed that libel was not protected speech. they agreed that symbolic speech could be protected. they agreed that speech rights could be limited to protect safety.

though the outcomes of tinker and schenck differed, which best describes what these court decisions have in common? they agreed that political expression could be restricted. they agreed that libel was not protected speech. they agreed that symbolic speech could be protected. they agreed that speech rights could be limited to protect safety.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

In Schenck v. United States (1919), the Supreme Court held that speech could be restricted if it posed a "clear and present danger," like falsely shouting fire in a theater. In Tinker v. Des Moines (1969), the Court protected symbolic speech (wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War) as long as it didn't disrupt school operations. Both cases involve limits on speech. Schenck restricts speech to protect public safety (during wartime, the speech could interfere with the draft). Tinker also has a safety - related limit (no disruption of school, which is a place where safety and order are important for learning).

Answer:

They agreed that speech rights could be limited to protect safety.