in tinker v. des moines, why did the supreme court rule in favor of the students who wore armbands? their…

in tinker v. des moines, why did the supreme court rule in favor of the students who wore armbands? their action did not negatively influence other students. their action was not disruptive. their action occurred off school grounds. their action was political speech.

in tinker v. des moines, why did the supreme court rule in favor of the students who wore armbands? their action did not negatively influence other students. their action was not disruptive. their action occurred off school grounds. their action was political speech.

Answer

Answer:

B. Their action was not disruptive.

Brief Explanations:

In Tinker v. Des Moines, the Supreme - Court held that students' wearing of armbands to protest the Vietnam War was a form of symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment as long as it was not disruptive to the educational environment. The key factor was that their action did not materially and substantially disrupt the work and discipline of the school.