in tinker v. des moines, why did the supreme court rule in favor of the students who wore armbands?\ntheir…
in tinker v. des moines, why did the supreme court rule in favor of the students who wore armbands?\ntheir action did not negatively influence other students.\ntheir action was not disruptive.\ntheir action occurred off school grounds.\ntheir action was political speech.
Answer
Brief Explanations:
In Tinker v. Des Moines, the Supreme - Court ruled in favor of the students because their wearing of armbands to protest the Vietnam War was considered symbolic speech that was not disruptive to the school environment. The Court held that students do not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." As long as the speech is not materially and substantially disruptive to the educational process, it is protected.
Answer:
Their action was not disruptive.