two justices dissented, stating that a person is \in custody\ when he or she feels restricted. they argued…

two justices dissented, stating that a person is \in custody\ when he or she feels restricted. they argued that the court of appeals was correct when it said that alvarado felt restricted. based on this fact, he should have been given a miranda warning to make him aware of his rights. which answer best describes the minority opinion? alvarado did not need to have his rights read. officers made sure that alvarado knew his rights. alvarado was actually in custody, because he felt restricted. officers did not pressure alvarado into confessing.

two justices dissented, stating that a person is \in custody\ when he or she feels restricted. they argued that the court of appeals was correct when it said that alvarado felt restricted. based on this fact, he should have been given a miranda warning to make him aware of his rights. which answer best describes the minority opinion? alvarado did not need to have his rights read. officers made sure that alvarado knew his rights. alvarado was actually in custody, because he felt restricted. officers did not pressure alvarado into confessing.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The minority opinion states that a person is in custody when they feel restricted and since Alvarado felt restricted, he should have had his Miranda rights read. This means they believe Alvarado was in custody.

Answer:

Alvarado was actually in custody, because he felt restricted.