understanding the case\nmatch each action to marbury or madison.\nrefused to honor an appointment\nwas…
understanding the case\nmatch each action to marbury or madison.\nrefused to honor an appointment\nwas appointed as a federal judge\nsupported the judiciary act of 1789\nargued for original jurisdiction\nmarbury\nmadison
Answer
Brief Explanations:
In the Marbury v. Madison case, Marbury was appointed as a federal - judge but Madison refused to honor the appointment. Marbury argued for original jurisdiction. The Judiciary Act of 1789 was not directly associated with one of them in the sense of support in this context.
Answer:
Refused to honor an appointment: Madison Was appointed as a federal judge: Marbury Supported the Judiciary Act of 1789: Neither (not applicable in this matching context) Argued for original jurisdiction: Marbury