in upholding louisianas separate car act, the supreme court claimed that\nsegregation was not the same as…

in upholding louisianas separate car act, the supreme court claimed that\nsegregation was not the same as discrimination.\nthe fourteenth amendment did not apply to southern states.\ndiscrimination was necessary in order to maintain public order.\nsegregation was unconstitutional based on the fourteenth amendment.

in upholding louisianas separate car act, the supreme court claimed that\nsegregation was not the same as discrimination.\nthe fourteenth amendment did not apply to southern states.\ndiscrimination was necessary in order to maintain public order.\nsegregation was unconstitutional based on the fourteenth amendment.

Answer

Answer:

segregation was not the same as discrimination.

Brief Explanations:

La Corte Suprema sostuvo en el caso Plessy v. Ferguson que la segregación racial no era discriminación si los servicios separados eran iguales, estableciendo el principio de "separado pero igual" al respaldar el Separate Car Act de Luisiana.