using what you have learned, match each supreme court case to the right that it incorporated against the…

using what you have learned, match each supreme court case to the right that it incorporated against the states.\ncantwell v. connecticut, about a local family preaching their religion door - to - door\neverson v. board of education, about state funds being used for transportation to religious schools\nmapp v. ohio, about a woman convicted with evidence obtained without a warrant\ngideon v. wainwright, about a man who could not afford a lawyer\ngitlow v. new york, about a journalist who published a radical article in a newspaper\nmcdonald v. chicago, about a man who wanted to be able to protect his home with a gun\nright\tcase\nthe exclusionary rule of the fourth amendment\t\n\nthe free speech and press rights of the first amendment\t\n\nthe establishment clause of the first amendment\t\n\nthe right to counsel of the sixth amendment\t\n\nthe gun rights of the second amendment\t\n\nthe free exercise clause of the first amendment\t

using what you have learned, match each supreme court case to the right that it incorporated against the states.\ncantwell v. connecticut, about a local family preaching their religion door - to - door\neverson v. board of education, about state funds being used for transportation to religious schools\nmapp v. ohio, about a woman convicted with evidence obtained without a warrant\ngideon v. wainwright, about a man who could not afford a lawyer\ngitlow v. new york, about a journalist who published a radical article in a newspaper\nmcdonald v. chicago, about a man who wanted to be able to protect his home with a gun\nright\tcase\nthe exclusionary rule of the fourth amendment\t\n\nthe free speech and press rights of the first amendment\t\n\nthe establishment clause of the first amendment\t\n\nthe right to counsel of the sixth amendment\t\n\nthe gun rights of the second amendment\t\n\nthe free exercise clause of the first amendment\t

Answer

Brief Explanations:

  1. Cantwell v. Connecticut: Involves a family preaching their religion door - to - door. This relates to the free exercise of religion, which is part of the First Amendment's free exercise clause. So it matches "the free exercise clause of the First Amendment".
  2. Everson v. Board of Education: Deals with state funds for transportation to religious schools. This is about the establishment clause (separation of church and state) of the First Amendment. So it matches "the establishment clause of the First Amendment".
  3. Mapp v. Ohio: A woman was convicted with evidence obtained without a warrant. The Fourth Amendment's exclusionary rule (evidence obtained improperly is excluded) is relevant here. So it matches "the exclusionary rule of the Fourth Amendment".
  4. Gideon v. Wainwright: A man who could not afford a lawyer. The Sixth Amendment gives the right to counsel. So it matches "the right to counsel of the Sixth Amendment".
  5. Gitlow v. New York: A journalist published a radical article. This involves free speech and press rights of the First Amendment. So it matches "the free speech and press rights of the First Amendment".
  6. McDonald v. Chicago: A man wanting to protect his home with a gun. This is about the Second Amendment's gun rights. So it matches "the gun rights of the Second Amendment".

Answer:

  • the exclusionary rule of the Fourth Amendment: Mapp v. Ohio, about a woman convicted with evidence obtained without a warrant
  • the free speech and press rights of the First Amendment: Gitlow v. New York, about a journalist who published a radical article in a newspaper
  • the establishment clause of the First Amendment: Everson v. Board of Education, about state funds being used for transportation to religious schools
  • the right to counsel of the Sixth Amendment: Gideon v. Wainwright, about a man who could not afford a lawyer
  • the gun rights of the Second Amendment: McDonald v. Chicago, about a man who wanted to be able to protect his home with a gun
  • the free exercise clause of the First Amendment: Cantwell v. Connecticut, about a local family preaching their religion door - to - door