the warren court ruled that a state law that forbid using, selling, or providing information about birth…

the warren court ruled that a state law that forbid using, selling, or providing information about birth control was\nunconstitutional because it violated the freedom of speech.\nconstitutional because it related to the right to religious freedom.\nunconstitutional because it violated the right to privacy.\nconstitutional because health care is a service, not a right.

the warren court ruled that a state law that forbid using, selling, or providing information about birth control was\nunconstitutional because it violated the freedom of speech.\nconstitutional because it related to the right to religious freedom.\nunconstitutional because it violated the right to privacy.\nconstitutional because health care is a service, not a right.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The Warren Court's ruling in Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) was based on the right to privacy. The Court held that the right to privacy, though not explicitly stated in the Constitution, is implied by several amendments (e.g., 1st, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 9th). The law in question violated this right as it intruded on marital privacy regarding contraception. It was not about freedom of speech (as it wasn't about general speech but private marital conduct), not about religious freedom (no religious exemption or promotion in the law's core issue), and health - care - as - service argument is not relevant to the privacy - based ruling.

Answer:

unconstitutional because it violated the right to privacy.