analyzing regression results\nlatasha was presented with the following data set and argued that there was no…

analyzing regression results\nlatasha was presented with the following data set and argued that there was no correlation between x and y. is latasha correct? use the regression equation to explain your reasoning.\n|x|1|2|3|4|5|6|7|\n|y|4|5|4|5|4|5|4|
Answer
Answer:
LaTasha is incorrect. There is a correlation.
Explanation:
Step1: Calculate the means
$\bar{x}=\frac{1 + 2+3+4+5+6+7}{7}=4$ $\bar{y}=\frac{4 + 5+4+5+4+5+4}{7}=4.4286$ (approx)
Step2: Calculate the slope ($m$)
$m=\frac{\sum_{i = 1}^{n}(x_i-\bar{x})(y_i - \bar{y})}{\sum_{i=1}^{n}(x_i-\bar{x})^2}$ $\sum_{i = 1}^{7}(x_i - 4)(y_i-4.4286)=(1 - 4)(4 - 4.4286)+(2 - 4)(5 - 4.4286)+(3 - 4)(4 - 4.4286)+(4 - 4)(5 - 4.4286)+(5 - 4)(4 - 4.4286)+(6 - 4)(5 - 4.4286)+(7 - 4)(4 - 4.4286)$ $=(- 3)(-0.4286)+(-2)(0.5714)+(-1)(-0.4286)+(0)(0.5714)+(1)(-0.4286)+(2)(0.5714)+(3)(-0.4286)$ $=1.2858-1.1428 + 0.4286+0 - 0.4286+1.1428-1.2858 = 0$ $\sum_{i=1}^{7}(x_i - 4)^2=(1 - 4)^2+(2 - 4)^2+(3 - 4)^2+(4 - 4)^2+(5 - 4)^2+(6 - 4)^2+(7 - 4)^2$ $=9 + 4+1+0+1+4+9 = 28$ $m = 0$
Step3: Calculate the y - intercept ($b$)
$b=\bar{y}-m\bar{x}=4.4286-0\times4 = 4.4286$ The regression equation is $y = 4.4286$. Although the slope is 0, the fact that we can find a non - trivial regression equation indicates a relationship (in this case, a horizontal relationship where $y$ has a constant expected value). So there is a correlation (a non - linear, constant relationship), and LaTasha is incorrect.