1 0 1 4 5\n2 3 3 5 6 6\n3 1 6 6 8 9 9 9\n4 0 1 2 4 6\n6 0 2 3 6\n7 0 1\nwhich of the following best explains…

1 0 1 4 5\n2 3 3 5 6 6\n3 1 6 6 8 9 9 9\n4 0 1 2 4 6\n6 0 2 3 6\n7 0 1\nwhich of the following best explains why one graph appears skewed and one graph appears symmetrical?\nthe scale of the box - and - whisker plot does not start at zero.\nthe interval of the box - and - whisker plot is too large.\nthe interval of the stem - and - leaf plot is not consistent.\nthe scale of the stem - and - leaf plot is too small for the set of data.

1 0 1 4 5\n2 3 3 5 6 6\n3 1 6 6 8 9 9 9\n4 0 1 2 4 6\n6 0 2 3 6\n7 0 1\nwhich of the following best explains why one graph appears skewed and one graph appears symmetrical?\nthe scale of the box - and - whisker plot does not start at zero.\nthe interval of the box - and - whisker plot is too large.\nthe interval of the stem - and - leaf plot is not consistent.\nthe scale of the stem - and - leaf plot is too small for the set of data.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

A non - zero starting scale in a box - and - whisker plot can distort the visual appearance of data distribution, making it seem skewed when it might not be in reality. A box - and - whisker plot with a non - zero start can compress or expand parts of the data, creating a false impression of skewness. In contrast, a stem - and - leaf plot shows the actual data values and can present a more accurate picture of symmetry if the data is symmetrically distributed.

Answer:

The scale of the box - and - whisker plot does not start at zero.