1 0 1 4 5\n2 3 3 5 6 6\n3 1 6 6 8 9 9\n4 0 1 2 4 6\n6 0 2 3 6\n7 0 1\nwhich of the following best explains…

1 0 1 4 5\n2 3 3 5 6 6\n3 1 6 6 8 9 9\n4 0 1 2 4 6\n6 0 2 3 6\n7 0 1\nwhich of the following best explains why one graph appears skewed and one graph appears symmetrical?\nthe scale of the box - and - whisker plot does not start at zero.\nthe interval of the box - and - whisker plot is too large.\nthe interval of the stem - and - leaf plot is not consistent.\nthe scale of the stem - and - leaf plot is too small for the set of data.

1 0 1 4 5\n2 3 3 5 6 6\n3 1 6 6 8 9 9\n4 0 1 2 4 6\n6 0 2 3 6\n7 0 1\nwhich of the following best explains why one graph appears skewed and one graph appears symmetrical?\nthe scale of the box - and - whisker plot does not start at zero.\nthe interval of the box - and - whisker plot is too large.\nthe interval of the stem - and - leaf plot is not consistent.\nthe scale of the stem - and - leaf plot is too small for the set of data.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The scale of a box - and - whisker plot can affect its visual appearance. If the scale does not start at zero, it can distort the perception of symmetry or skewness. A non - zero starting scale can stretch or compress parts of the plot, making it seem skewed when it might not be in reality. The other options about interval consistency and scale size for stem - and - leaf plots are not relevant to the visual difference in symmetry/skewness between the two types of plots mentioned.

Answer:

The scale of the box - and - whisker plot does not start at zero.