ice cream sales and the number of shark attacks have a positive correlation. the conclusion that eating ice…

ice cream sales and the number of shark attacks have a positive correlation. the conclusion that eating ice cream causes shark attacks is a justifiable, because the milk in ice cream attracts sharks. b justifiable, because a positive correlation implies causation. c not justifiable, because a positive correlation negates causation. d not justifiable, because ice cream sales and shark attacks both rise during the summer.

ice cream sales and the number of shark attacks have a positive correlation. the conclusion that eating ice cream causes shark attacks is a justifiable, because the milk in ice cream attracts sharks. b justifiable, because a positive correlation implies causation. c not justifiable, because a positive correlation negates causation. d not justifiable, because ice cream sales and shark attacks both rise during the summer.

Answer

Answer:

D. not justifiable, because ice cream sales and shark attacks both rise during the summer.

Brief Explanation:

Correlation does not imply causation. Summer is a confounding factor.