s with intervals & tests\n1. identify each scenario conduction as resulting from a bad study design or as…

s with intervals & tests\n1. identify each scenario conduction as resulting from a bad study design or as resulting from an error. explain your choice.\n a. a study for cash in region 40 was done using a machine that malfunctions the pressure of the tire and misreads the tires actual (psi). conclusion: we are convinced that the cash is unfair.\n b. among all senior students at a large high school, 50% of them plan on pursuing a degree in engineering after graduation. in a random sample of 100 senior students from this school, however, only 47 were planning to pursue engineering. we are convinced that less than 50% of the senior students plan on pursuing engineering.\n 1 2 3 4\n c. among all senior students at a large high school, 50% of them plan on pursuing a degree in engineering after graduation. a survey of 100 senior students in ap calculus classes showed that 40 students plan on pursuing engineering. we are convinced that more than 50% of all students plan on pursuing engineering.\n 5 6\n3. identify the type of error. if there is no error, select no error.\nno error\ntype 1 error\ntype 2 error\n4. why was this the correct selection?
Answer
Brief Explanations:
A Type - 2 error occurs when we fail to reject a false null hypothesis. Without seeing the full context of the null hypothesis and the data analysis in the problem, if we assume that the conclusion was made in a way that missed detecting a true effect or difference (i.e., wrongly failed to reject the null), it would be a Type - 2 error.
Answer:
- Type 2 Error
- A Type 2 error is made when we fail to reject a false null hypothesis. Presumably, in the context of the problem, the analysis failed to detect a real - world effect or difference, leading to the incorrect non - rejection of the null hypothesis.