michael surveyed the basketball team and found a positive correlation of r = 0.12 between students missing…

michael surveyed the basketball team and found a positive correlation of r = 0.12 between students missing games due to academic probation and spikes in the teams scoring average. he concluded that students with poor grades did not score as many points as those with good grades, and the students with poor grades caused the team to score fewer points while on the court. michael does not have a good argument because the information he used shows a positive correlation, which does not imply

michael surveyed the basketball team and found a positive correlation of r = 0.12 between students missing games due to academic probation and spikes in the teams scoring average. he concluded that students with poor grades did not score as many points as those with good grades, and the students with poor grades caused the team to score fewer points while on the court. michael does not have a good argument because the information he used shows a positive correlation, which does not imply

Answer

Brief Explanations:

A correlation value of $r = 0.12$ is a weak positive correlation. Just because there is a positive correlation between students missing games due to academic probation and spikes in team - scoring average doesn't mean that students with poor grades cause the team to score fewer points. Correlation does not imply causation.

Answer:

weak; causation.