the number of times a player has golfed in ones lifetime is compared to the number of strokes it takes the…

the number of times a player has golfed in ones lifetime is compared to the number of strokes it takes the player to complete 18 holes. the correlation coefficient relating the two variables is -0.26. which best describes the strength of the correlation, and what is true about the causation between the variables? it is a weak negative correlation, and it is not likely causal. it is a weak negative correlation, and it is likely causal. it is a strong negative correlation, and it is not likely causal. it is a strong negative correlation, and it is likely causal.

the number of times a player has golfed in ones lifetime is compared to the number of strokes it takes the player to complete 18 holes. the correlation coefficient relating the two variables is -0.26. which best describes the strength of the correlation, and what is true about the causation between the variables? it is a weak negative correlation, and it is not likely causal. it is a weak negative correlation, and it is likely causal. it is a strong negative correlation, and it is not likely causal. it is a strong negative correlation, and it is likely causal.

Answer

Explanation:

Step1: Interpretar el coeficiente de correlación

El coeficiente de correlación está entre - 1 y 1. Un valor cercano a - 1 o 1 indica una correlación fuerte, mientras que un valor cercano a 0 indica una correlación débil. Aquí, el coeficiente de correlación es - 0.26, que es cercano a 0, por lo que es una correlación débil.

Step2: Analizar la causalidad

El hecho de que dos variables estén correlacionadas no significa necesariamente que una cause a la otra. En este caso, el número de veces que un jugador ha jugado golf en su vida y el número de trazos que toma para completar 18 hoyos pueden estar relacionados, pero no es obvio que uno cause al otro. Por ejemplo, pueden haber otros factores como la habilidad natural del jugador, la frecuencia del entrenamiento, etc. que influyen en los trazos. Entonces, no es probable que haya una relación causal.

Answer:

It is a weak negative correlation, and it is not likely causal.