the number of times a player has golfed in ones lifetime is compared to the number of strokes it takes the…

the number of times a player has golfed in ones lifetime is compared to the number of strokes it takes the player to complete 18 holes. the correlation coefficient relating the two variables is -0.26. which best describes the strength of the correlation, and what is true about the causation between the variables? o it is a weak negative correlation, and it is not likely causal. o it is a weak negative correlation, and it is likely causal. o it is a strong negative correlation, and it is not likely causal. o it is a strong negative correlation, and it is likely causal.

the number of times a player has golfed in ones lifetime is compared to the number of strokes it takes the player to complete 18 holes. the correlation coefficient relating the two variables is -0.26. which best describes the strength of the correlation, and what is true about the causation between the variables? o it is a weak negative correlation, and it is not likely causal. o it is a weak negative correlation, and it is likely causal. o it is a strong negative correlation, and it is not likely causal. o it is a strong negative correlation, and it is likely causal.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The correlation coefficient ranges from -1 to 1. Values close to -1 or 1 indicate strong correlation, while values close to 0 indicate weak correlation. Here, -0.26 is close to 0, so it's a weak negative correlation. Just because two variables are correlated doesn't mean one causes the other. In this case, the number of times a player has golfed in a lifetime may not directly cause the number of strokes to complete 18 - holes.

Answer:

It is a weak negative correlation, and it is not likely causal.