read the sample student claim and counter - claim. claim: although many people argue that medical testing on…

read the sample student claim and counter - claim. claim: although many people argue that medical testing on animals is a violation of animal rights, the benefits it yields for society far outweigh any argument that can be made. counter - claim: there are safer and more accurate ways to test medications without using animals. what evidence would most weaken the counter - claim presented here? the physiologies of humans and some animals are very similar, so the reactions of these creatures to certain medications are the most reliable guide to the possible reactions of human patients. scientists are more easily able to control an animals environment, such as diet and temperature, than they are that of humans, which makes the tests far more reliable than alternative methods. animals have emotions and can feel pain much as humans do, which is why i feel that it is cruel to subject these vulnerable creatures to unfair tests that we are unwilling to conduct on humans. if we ban testing on animals for medical research that could save lives, then it also must be made illegal to hunt and kill animals simply because we would like to

read the sample student claim and counter - claim. claim: although many people argue that medical testing on animals is a violation of animal rights, the benefits it yields for society far outweigh any argument that can be made. counter - claim: there are safer and more accurate ways to test medications without using animals. what evidence would most weaken the counter - claim presented here? the physiologies of humans and some animals are very similar, so the reactions of these creatures to certain medications are the most reliable guide to the possible reactions of human patients. scientists are more easily able to control an animals environment, such as diet and temperature, than they are that of humans, which makes the tests far more reliable than alternative methods. animals have emotions and can feel pain much as humans do, which is why i feel that it is cruel to subject these vulnerable creatures to unfair tests that we are unwilling to conduct on humans. if we ban testing on animals for medical research that could save lives, then it also must be made illegal to hunt and kill animals simply because we would like to

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The counter - claim is that there are safer and more accurate non - animal ways to test medications. Options A and B support animal testing as reliable, which weakens the counter - claim. Option C is about animal emotions and cruelty, not about testing accuracy. Option D is about the legality of hunting and animal testing, not about non - animal testing methods. Options A and B show that animal testing has advantages over non - animal methods, thus weakening the counter - claim.

Answer:

A. The physiologies of humans and some animals are very similar, so the reactions of these creatures to certain medications are the most reliable guide to the possible reactions of human patients. B. Scientists are more easily able to control an animal's environment, such as diet and temperature, than they are that of humans, which makes the tests far more reliable than alternative methods.