read the sample student claim and counterclaim: claim: although many people argue that medical testing on…

read the sample student claim and counterclaim: claim: although many people argue that medical testing on animals is a violation of animal rights, the benefit it yields for society far outweigh any argument that can be made. counter - claim: there are safer and more accurate ways to test medications without using animals. what evidence would most weaken the counterclaim presented here? the physiologies of humans and some animals are very similar, so the reactions of these creatures to certain medications are the most reliable guide to the possible reactions of human patients. scientists are more easily able to control an animals environment, such as diet and temperature, than they are of humans, which makes the tests far more reliable than alternative methods. animals have emotions and can feel pain much as humans do, which is why i feel that it is cruel to subject these vulnerable creatures to unfair tests that we are unwilling to conduct on humans. if we ban testing on animals for medical research that could save lives, then it also must be made

read the sample student claim and counterclaim: claim: although many people argue that medical testing on animals is a violation of animal rights, the benefit it yields for society far outweigh any argument that can be made. counter - claim: there are safer and more accurate ways to test medications without using animals. what evidence would most weaken the counterclaim presented here? the physiologies of humans and some animals are very similar, so the reactions of these creatures to certain medications are the most reliable guide to the possible reactions of human patients. scientists are more easily able to control an animals environment, such as diet and temperature, than they are of humans, which makes the tests far more reliable than alternative methods. animals have emotions and can feel pain much as humans do, which is why i feel that it is cruel to subject these vulnerable creatures to unfair tests that we are unwilling to conduct on humans. if we ban testing on animals for medical research that could save lives, then it also must be made

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The counter - claim is that there are safer and more accurate ways to test medications without using animals. The first option shows that the similarities between human and some animal physiologies make animal testing reliable, thus weakening the counter - claim. The second option supports animal testing but not by weakening the idea of alternative methods. The third option is an ethical argument against animal testing and doesn't weaken the claim about alternative methods. The fourth option is about the ban on animal testing and its consequences, not about the existence of alternative methods.

Answer:

The physiologies of humans and some animals are very similar, so the reactions of these creatures to certain medications are the most reliable guide to the possible reactions of human patients.