ryan gathered data about the age of the different dogs in his neighborhood and the length of their tails…

ryan gathered data about the age of the different dogs in his neighborhood and the length of their tails. which best describes the strength of the correlation, and what is true about the causation between the variables? lengths of tails for dogs of different ages age (years) length of tail (in.) 2 12 3 0 6 7 10 4 it is a weak negative correlation, and it is not likely causal. it is a weak negative correlation, and it is likely causal. it is a strong negative correlation, and it is not likely causal. it is a strong negative correlation, and it is likely causal.

ryan gathered data about the age of the different dogs in his neighborhood and the length of their tails. which best describes the strength of the correlation, and what is true about the causation between the variables? lengths of tails for dogs of different ages age (years) length of tail (in.) 2 12 3 0 6 7 10 4 it is a weak negative correlation, and it is not likely causal. it is a weak negative correlation, and it is likely causal. it is a strong negative correlation, and it is not likely causal. it is a strong negative correlation, and it is likely causal.

Answer

Explanation:

Step1: Analyze data trend

As age increases (2, 3, 6, 10), tail - length (12, 0, 7, 4) does not show a very consistent decrease. There is no clear and strong pattern. So the correlation is weak.

Step2: Consider causation

There is no biological or logical reason to assume that a dog's age directly causes a change in its tail - length. So it is not likely causal.

Answer:

It is a weak negative correlation, and it is not likely causal.