ryan gathered data about the age of the different dogs in his neighborhood and the length of their tails…

ryan gathered data about the age of the different dogs in his neighborhood and the length of their tails. which best describes the strength of the correlation, and what is true about the causation between the variables? lengths of tails for dogs of different ages age (years) length of tail (in) 2 12 3 0 6 7 10 4 it is a weak negative correlation, and it is not likely causal. it is a weak negative correlation, and it is likely causal. it is a strong negative correlation, and it is not likely causal. it is a strong negative correlation, and it is likely causal.

ryan gathered data about the age of the different dogs in his neighborhood and the length of their tails. which best describes the strength of the correlation, and what is true about the causation between the variables? lengths of tails for dogs of different ages age (years) length of tail (in) 2 12 3 0 6 7 10 4 it is a weak negative correlation, and it is not likely causal. it is a weak negative correlation, and it is likely causal. it is a strong negative correlation, and it is not likely causal. it is a strong negative correlation, and it is likely causal.

Answer

Explanation:

Step1: Analyze the data trend

As the age (2, 3, 6, 10) increases, the length of tail (12, 0, 7, 4) generally decreases, indicating a negative - correlation.

Step2: Determine correlation strength

With only 4 data points and the values not showing a very consistent decrease, it is a weak negative correlation.

Step3: Consider causation

There is no obvious biological or logical reason for age to directly cause the length of a dog's tail. So it is not likely causal.

Answer:

It is a weak negative correlation, and it is not likely causal.