architecture\nthe modern philosophy of \out with the old, in with the new\ has been used and abused for…

architecture\nthe modern philosophy of \out with the old, in with the new\ has been used and abused for years. oftentimes, it has more to do with making a profit rather than a legitimate need for something new. across the united states, beautiful, historic architecture is frequently destroyed to make way for malls, high - rise apartment buildings, grandiose homes, and other structures. unfortunately, little is done to protect our history.\nover the past several years, it has become increasingly common for big - name developers to tear down victorian, craftsman, and colonial buildings. this destruction is often performed with the thought that it is the property that holds the true value, not the structure that sits on it. likewise, homeowners have begun to value their propertys location over the house they have spent many years living in. little regard is given to the painstaking details and craftsmanship that went into these buildings, nor the innate beauty of hand - carved woodwork and ornamentation. \out with the old, in with the new\ has resulted in people no longer appreciating the history and artistic integrity of our countrys oldest buildings and failing to realize that once \the new\ is brought in, \the old\ is lost to us forever.\nit is bad enough that developers and private citizens are blind to the beauty around them; what is worse is that local governments refuse to step in and prevent this destruction. cities and towns need to stand up to large developers that flash money around in the name of progress. rather than allowing developers to tear down\n3\nselect the correct answer.\nhow could the writer improve the underlined sentence to remove the logical fallacy?\na. the \out with the old, in with the new\ approach to architecture is clearly a result of people who no longer care about our countrys oldest buildings.\nb. anyone who accepts the \out with the old, in with the new\ architectural philosophy is a menace to society.\nc. some people have embraced the \out with the old, in with the new\ philosophy, as the number of applications for demolition permits hit a record high this year.\nd. everyone who appreciates our countrys oldest buildings should forget the architectural philosophy \out with the old, in with the new\.\nreset next\n© 2025 edmentum. all rights reserved.

architecture\nthe modern philosophy of \out with the old, in with the new\ has been used and abused for years. oftentimes, it has more to do with making a profit rather than a legitimate need for something new. across the united states, beautiful, historic architecture is frequently destroyed to make way for malls, high - rise apartment buildings, grandiose homes, and other structures. unfortunately, little is done to protect our history.\nover the past several years, it has become increasingly common for big - name developers to tear down victorian, craftsman, and colonial buildings. this destruction is often performed with the thought that it is the property that holds the true value, not the structure that sits on it. likewise, homeowners have begun to value their propertys location over the house they have spent many years living in. little regard is given to the painstaking details and craftsmanship that went into these buildings, nor the innate beauty of hand - carved woodwork and ornamentation. \out with the old, in with the new\ has resulted in people no longer appreciating the history and artistic integrity of our countrys oldest buildings and failing to realize that once \the new\ is brought in, \the old\ is lost to us forever.\nit is bad enough that developers and private citizens are blind to the beauty around them; what is worse is that local governments refuse to step in and prevent this destruction. cities and towns need to stand up to large developers that flash money around in the name of progress. rather than allowing developers to tear down\n3\nselect the correct answer.\nhow could the writer improve the underlined sentence to remove the logical fallacy?\na. the \out with the old, in with the new\ approach to architecture is clearly a result of people who no longer care about our countrys oldest buildings.\nb. anyone who accepts the \out with the old, in with the new\ architectural philosophy is a menace to society.\nc. some people have embraced the \out with the old, in with the new\ philosophy, as the number of applications for demolition permits hit a record high this year.\nd. everyone who appreciates our countrys oldest buildings should forget the architectural philosophy \out with the old, in with the new\.\nreset next\n© 2025 edmentum. all rights reserved.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The original statement is a broad - generalization logical fallacy. Option C provides evidence (increase in demolition permit applications) to support the claim about people embracing the philosophy without making extreme generalizations like the other options. Option A makes an assumption about people's care for old buildings, Option B is an extreme and unfair label, and Option D is also an extreme generalization.

Answer:

C. Some people have embraced the “out with the old, in with the new” philosophy, as the number of applications for demolition permits hit a record high this year.