what is the authors main claim in the article? a digital documents save time and money. b digital documents…

Brief Explanations:

To determine the author's main claim, we need to analyze the options in the context of the given sentence. The sentence "Digital is good for the Earth" implies an environmental - friendly aspect of digital documents. Option A focuses on time and money, Option B makes a general comparison without an environmental angle, and Option C focuses on ease. Since the sentence emphasizes the environmental benefit of digital, we can infer that printed documents may be less environmentally friendly. Evidence could be that printing requires paper which is made from trees and uses ink and energy.

Answer:

For the first part: None of the given options directly capture the main claim from the given sentence. For the second part: Printed documents may be less environmentally friendly. Evidence: The sentence "Digital is good for the Earth" implies that digital has an environmental advantage over printed documents as printing requires paper (from trees), ink, and energy.